Yahoo Image search adds Creative Commons - Windows Watch

 
Windows Watch Windows Watch Windows Watch Windows Watch
A blog from Computeractive

« Make software work the way you want | Main | Speeding up web browsing »

Yahoo Image search adds Creative Commons

Getting copyright right when using images from the internet is very important, and not just as far as the artist is concerned. A reader contacted us once after receiving a bill out of the blue for an image he had used (click on the more link to read the full text).

One way to avoid expensive confusions is to look for images that have a Creative Commons license. You can search several sites via the Creative Commons website, including Flickr, and this has been helpful several times in the past when I’ve been putting posters together.

image Yahoo has made life easier when it comes to finding images for projects by adding some Creative Commons options to their image search page. The changes are made to the search immediately so you don’t have to repeat it to change the options.

It can be a pain when the perfect image isn’t available, but you owe it to the artist to abide by the licenses.

I am webmaster for a small amateur theatre company and recently used a picture from Google Images on the website to promote an in-house Family Fun Day.  A few weeks later at the end of August, I received a demand for the sum of £964 for use of the image without payment. I had never heard of the company but it said it owns the copyrights to the photograph. The paperwork states there is no negotiation possible re-their payment demand. It also said it was not acceptable to say it was not known that the image was copyrighted, or that it was downloaded from another web-site, which indeed it had been. There was no intention to defraud anybody but the photo had no rights warning and so I assumed it would be in order to use it. I would willingly pay a few hundred to clear this up, but £900 plus? I am frantic.
Terry Swoffer

Case solved

The image Mr Swoffer used was from Getty Images. The amount demanded by Getty seems to be a standard fee for cases of copyright infringement. Although Mr Swoffer stated that the demand he received said no negotiation was possible, you usually can thrash out an agreement acceptable to both parties. We contacted Getty and the representative told us that it would always try to reach a compromise. It said it realised people inadvertently use its images and in Mr Swoffer’s case there was no malicious intent to defraud the photographer or itself. However it pointed out that if someone uses a photo without permission, the photographer doesn’t get paid his or her royalties so it is very hot on copyright infringement.  We explained he had tried repeatedly to reach the company to no avail. We are happy to report that Getty contacted Mr Swoffer, who incidentally had immediately removed the image from the website, and withdrew its demand for payment.

Although Mr Swoffer said there was no reference anywhere to state that the image had copyright restrictions, it is always best to assume this is the case when using material that is not your own. We should also point out that on Google images it does clearly state those photos are subject to copyright. If you are not sure don’t use the image. The same rule of thumb applies to music, videos, works of art, published text etc.

The 1988 Copyright, Designs and Patents Act
UK copyright law gives the creators of literary, dramatic, musical, artistic works, sound recordings, broadcasts, films and typographical arrangement of published editions, rights to control the ways in which their material may be used. The Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has more information www.ipo.gov.uk/copy.htm

Comments

Bloggers or everyone who uses the net should equip themselves with these type of information.

posted-by Michael Brown | June 3, 2009 1:06 AM

I didnt know Yahoo was still arouund. ;)

posted-by Tom Jenkins | June 3, 2009 4:27 AM

Hai!

Thanks for your article.

Kavvi
-----

posted-by vk107 | June 3, 2009 9:13 AM

Yahoo come back:)

-----------------

posted-by Mic | June 7, 2009 8:32 PM

I did not know about the Creative Commons until I have read this post. This is an advantage for the artist of the image.

posted-by Chitika Review | June 9, 2009 4:22 PM

yes. yahoo is still alive and kicking. well at least it's still there.

posted-by domjoel | June 14, 2009 6:13 AM

Good Day. The great thing about a computer notebook is that no matter how much you stuff into it, it doesn't get bigger or heavier.
I am from Swaziland and learning to speak English, please tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "The city has been improved from game albums to a range that she could generally look initially."

Thanks for the help :(, Quinta.

posted-by Quinta | September 6, 2009 12:54 AM

Post a comment







Site credentials: About | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions | Top of the page
© Incisive Media Investments Limited 2010, Published by Incisive Financial Publishing Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, are companies registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 04252091 & 04252093