Why do people hate Microsoft? - Windows Watch

Windows Watch Windows Watch Windows Watch Windows Watch
A blog from Computeractive

« AVG takes on product name | Main | Review: Rez Xbox 360 game »

Why do people hate Microsoft?

Hatems_2 The recent news that Microsoft might purchase Yahoo! has not gone down particularly well with the users of Yahoo's Flickr image sharing service - including one Giles Bowkett, who posted the image shown here (under a Creative Commons license - click the image to see it on his page).

This reaction isn't particularly surprising - after all, there were similarly vocal protests when Flickr, originally developed by a Canadian startup called Ludicorp, was purchased by Yahoo. It is a bit different, though: rather than a major company buying a small business, the potential Microsoft takeover would simply be one giant technology company buying another. So why the fuss?

In part, I think it's because people simply hate Microsoft. But why?

For many people - including some Windows Watch commenters - Microsoft represents all that is evil and wrong in the world. For some, it may be a simple example of anticapitalism - Microsoft is a large company that makes lots of money, so if you hate the idea of businesses making money it's an obvious target. But then many people who hate Microsoft also love Apple - which is, of course, a large company that makes shedloads of money. What's more, it's certain that there are more Microsoft-haters out there than there are No-Logo-toting Linux fans that never drink Coca Cola, so many people must be perfectly happy with some large corporations, just not with Microsoft.

I'd suggest that the reason for many people's dislike of Microsoft is simple: they enjoy having something to hate, and a huge corporate entity is as good a target as any. After all, focusing your rage on the man next door might have unforseen and unpleasant consequences, but shouting abuse at Word 2007 is fairly safe (at least until Microsoft builds in working speech recognition and an office assistant that can give as good as it gets). What's more, hating Microsoft is popular, and everyone loves a bandwagon to jump on.

With this in mind, I've tried to compile a list of genuinely sensible reasons to hate, or at least dislike, Microsoft. And they are:

  1. Anti-competitive behaviour, as highlighted by the EU's long running legal process
  2. Some staggeringly shoddy web browsers (anyone remember the Tantek box-model hack for IE5?) that generally failed to render almost anything correctly, but which destroyed Netscape. It should be noted that IE7, although not perfect, is a great improvement
  3. Security holes aplenty, although most are patched (whether they're patched quickly enough is an argument for another day)
  4. DRM. Microsoft makes it, and some people hate it - but of course Apple develops and sells DRM, too, so anyone who buys Apple products can't jump on this one
  5. Microsoft's Reno office (if you are a US taxpayer, at least)
  6. ActiveX in general
  7. Embrace, Extend and Extinguish - allegedly
  8. That eyeball-searing video of Steve Ballmer (click here, if you must)

And that's about it. Now, several of these are annoying, and some disconcerting, but none seem to me as significantly more troublesome as the behaviour of other companies of a similar size. And, if one accepts free market capitalism as the way forward (I'll assume that most readers will take this as a given, but prove me wrong, comrades) then a company producing the best product in its field, and thus becoming hugely rich, is surely the logical conclusion of this system rather than some sort of aberration. What's more, it's not as if Microsoft's founders have ever given huge chunks of money away.

All in all, I remain unconvinced. I'll continue  to use Windows XP and Word almost every day, although where possible I'll also support alternatives, be they the iPod (if you choose not to buy DRM'd music, the Classic is a fantastic music player), Nokia's Symbian phones (better than Windows Mobile in every way, IMHO) or Firefox and Thunderbird. But can you convince me - have I missed something from the list? If so, add it in the comments.

Comments

My hatred of M/Soft began with their overbearing attitude towards the games market. Put simply it was "we bought the makers of Halo ... therfore Halo will only be on the X-box platform until we say otherwise and if you haven't got an X-box then fuck you"

posted-by Martin Ward | February 7, 2008 3:18 PM

I just don't like their attitude towards other companies, and I dislike other large companies for the same reason. I prefer Linux, more secure and less buggy, but I can't switch because I like computer games. That situation's unlikely to change. Logic is irrelevant once you've seen Ballmer anyway . . .

posted-by Darth TommyV | February 7, 2008 9:27 PM

I am a Linux user.
I do not use Windows because I don't like Windows.
I am neutral on the topic of Microsoft, I just don't care because they're not part of my world.
I agree with this:
http://www.psychocats.net/essays/zealots

posted-by gn2 | February 8, 2008 1:28 PM

Hello,

I am a M$ hater for several reasons :
- Monopolistic practices make me sick, I am a bit paranoid and an OS having 90% of the market share makes me worry a lot.
- Anti-freedom practice, you do not own your windows operating system, it acts by itself.
- I am anti-capitalist, I think the capitalism the way it s presented by the US is just wrong.
- Holes and stuff, as said in this article, M$ products have holes in them making it not as reliable.
- I have read too many articles against M$, there is no way I can like them anymore.

posted-by Zelrik | February 23, 2008 7:51 PM

Why Craig Knapp hates Microsoft. Still no "dual pane" viewer despite the fact that in the mid 1990s Norton Commander for DOS and currently 2xExplorer provide this necessary feature, considering that that most computer users move data from USB devices, digital camera memory chips, etc, to their hard drives, the need for a dual pane viewer is obvious. MS My Computer still cannot sort on the fly after renaming files like the free program 2xExplorer can. In 2008 MS Word still cannot automatically follow the paragraph numbering conventions started by the typist, you must "beat it with a hammer" to make it follow your numbering conventions, but WordPerfect 6.0 for DOS intuitively followed your numbering conventions back in the mid 1990s. If the user browses to C:\data 90% of the time why does Windows not ask the user if this should be the default directory when opening My Computer, yes I can edit the registry to make this happen or use 2xExplorer and set it up to open to a directory of my choice. As long as MS is the main distributor (notice I did not say innovator) of software we do not have to worry about computers taking over the world because AI is not in their vocabulary. In the words of Kurt Vonnegut "I had to laugh". Craig Knapp

posted-by Craig Knapp | April 12, 2008 3:12 PM

I hate microsoft because they don't think about the heuristics when they design their software. It is almost as if they try to annoy their users. There are countless examples, but the most blatant that everyone can identify with is Vista's UAC.

Did they try that out on a test group beforehand?

posted-by Hank Paulson | November 15, 2008 2:09 AM

Post a comment







Site credentials: About | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions | Top of the page
© Incisive Media Ltd. 2008
Incisive Media Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, is a company registered in the United Kingdom with company registration number 04038503